GitHub
scholar-loop
观察池 · 暂无正式排名
该项目当前未满足“两个有效维度 + 两种数据源”的主榜门槛。
— 未排名
可观测采用度缺失 —
动量当前有效 · 2026-09-12 0
关注度当前有效 · 2026-09-12 0
信号可信度 依据当前有数据的独立评分维度数量计算。
中2/3 · 1 种数据源
项目介绍
read papers → find a gap → run real experiments → reflect → write & self-review
ScholarLoop runs the loop a PhD actually runs: it reads the literature, forms a grounded hypothesis, runs real ML experiments, scores them against a frozen ground-truth metric, learns from its failures, and drafts a peer-reviewed write-up — autonomously, with a deterministic harness that keeps the agents honest and impossible to reward-hack.
The LLM does only the open-ended reasoning. Everything checkable — search-space pruning, dedup, calibration, number-grounding, promotion gates — is deterministic, unit-tested code, and the metric is the only optimization target (no LLM-as-judge in the optimization loop).…
各数据源
469 Star
- Star 469
- Fork 35
- 提交 26
- 发布 0